Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Arya, Poonam; Christ, Tanya; Chiu, Ming |
---|---|
Titel | Links between Characteristics of Collaborative Peer Video Analysis Events and Literacy Teachers' Outcomes |
Quelle | In: Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23 (2015) 2, S.159-183 (25 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1059-7069 |
Schlagwörter | Video Technology; Coding; Statistical Analysis; Teaching Methods; Teacher Collaboration; Peer Influence; Peer Evaluation; Teacher Competencies; Feedback (Response); Discussion (Teaching Technique); Literacy Education; Graduate Students; Practicums; Elementary School Teachers; Secondary School Teachers; Reading Instruction; Knowledge Base for Teaching; Interaction; Discourse Analysis Codierung; Programmierung; Statistische Analyse; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Lehrerkooperation; Lehrkunst; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Practicum; Praktikum; Praktika; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Leseunterricht; Teaching theory; Theory of teaching; Unterrichtstheorie; Interaktion; Diskursanalyse |
Abstract | This study examined how characteristics of Collaborative Peer Video Analysis (CPVA) events are related to teachers' pedagogical outcomes. Data included 39 transcribed literacy video events, in which 14 in-service teachers engaged in discussions of their video clips. Emergent coding and Statistical Discourse Analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings suggest that particular types of clips (assessment vs. instruction), the purpose for sharing (problems vs. successes), and conversation-turn characteristics--including aspects of pedagogy discussed, aspects of disciplinary knowledge discussed, sources of knowledge, and conversation actions--predicted teachers' outcomes, such as generation of specific categories of pedagogical ideas and their consideration of applying these ideas in their future literacy pedagogy. Additionally, based on the explanatory model, most of the differences in whether teachers generated ideas or considered applying them in future occurred within a CPVA event (across conversation turns) rather than across events. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. P.O. Box 1545, Chesapeake, VA 23327. Tel: 757-366-5606; Fax: 703-997-8760; e-mail: info@aace.org; Web site: http://www.aace.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |